Vietnam or Thailand ? Vote for the TOP Country of the Week !
Updated: June 8, 2025
A sane criticism will allow that this is very largely true, but will not, we are convinced, be constrained to believe with M. Loisy that the historical original of the Christian Redeemer was the poor deluded enthusiast whom he portrays in 'Les Évangiles Synoptiques.
The M.O. who looked at his wound saw that the thing was hopeless, and did not expect him to live beyond Loisy. He was bleeding internally and no surgeon on earth could have saved him. When he reached us he was almost pulseless, but he recovered for a moment and asked for me. I found him, with blue lips and a face drained of blood, lying on my camp bed. His voice was very small and far away.
The attractiveness of Catholicism as a cult depends almost wholly on its frank admission of the miraculous as a matter of daily occurrence. To rationalise even contemporary history as M. Loisy has rationalised the Gospels would be suicide for Catholicism.
I'll have a trifle over when I've paid your woman fer her trouble. I wuz thinkin' like enough you'd let me run up a shanty on yer place here. Loisy wouldn't mind about style just a roof to bring 'em to. It's fer her and the boy, you know," watching Joel's face eagerly. "Yes, yes, Brice; we'll make it all right. Just take things kind o' easy.
Le Quatrième Évangile, passim. Loisy, Les Évangiles Synoptiques, p. 214. Ibid. p. 218. Loisy, Les Évangiles Synoptiques, p. 223. The Programme of Modernism, pp. 82, 83. Ibid. p. 90. Loisy, Simples Réflexions, p. 211. Laberthonnière, Le Réalisme Chrétien et l'Idéalisme Grec, pp. 44, 45. Malachi, ii. 6. Le Roy, Dogme et Critique, p. 26. This is not carelessness on the part of the writer.
Higgs among the followers of Loisy; her position is in many ways different; nor is she wholly to be identified with the concrete Hebraism of Harnack."
And on what principles are such liberties taken with our authorities? What is the criterion by which it is decided that Christ said, 'I am a king, but not 'My kingdom is not of this world'? Why must the resurrection have been only a subjective hallucination in the minds of the disciples? To these questions there is a plain answer. The non-intervention of God in history is an axiom with the Modernists. 'L'historien, says M. Loisy, 'n'a pas
No one who has read any of Newman's works can doubt that he would have recoiled with horror from the destructive criticism of Loisy, the contempt for scholastic authority of Tyrrell, and the defiance hurled at the Papacy in the manifesto of the Italian Modernists.
The Bible is none other than the Word of God, not some part of it more, some part of it less, but all alike the utterance of Him who sitteth upon the throne, faultless, unerring, supreme." The Martian compared this statement with the words of the scholar Loisy, "If God himself wrote the Bible, we must believe Him to be either ignorant or untruthful."
It would be very hard for Napoleon and Pitt to kneel together down before Christ and to embrace each other. It would be almost impossible for Bismarck and Gambetta to walk together. Not less it would be impossible for the Pope and Monsieur Loisy or George Tyrrel to pray in the same bench. Every generation is laden with sins and prejudices.
Word Of The Day
Others Looking