Vietnam or Thailand ? Vote for the TOP Country of the Week !
Updated: May 20, 2025
This would be evidently wrong. This Susarman was not the king of the Trigartas but another person who was on the Pandava side. Both the Bengal and the Bombay texts have Rathanika. The correct reading as settled by the Burdwan Pundits, is Gajanika. Both the Bengal and the Bombay texts read Arjunas in the second line of 21. The Burdwan Pundits are for correcting it as Arjunam.
The Bengal reading Gooranamatitejasa is what I adopt. The Bombay reading, Ghoranamapnitaujasam involves a useless hyperbole. Of course, atitejasa qualifies dhanusha in the next line. Kandigbhutas lit. "not knowing which point of the compass was which." In the second line of 17, the Bombay text incorrectly reads Arjunam for Pandavas. In the first line of 32 the Bengal reading is Mahabhujas.
Word Of The Day
Others Looking