United States or Luxembourg ? Vote for the TOP Country of the Week !


It will be our purpose in the following discussion to ascertain just what are these problems in dynamical biology and how far they have been answered.

I am going to be a doctor. In college I was very well up in physiology and anatomy, and I went quite a way in biology. So you see I have a good start. I am going to attend lectures and go into a hospital, as soon as there is an opening, and then I mean to practice. One essential for a young doctor I have in advance. That is patients.

He would have none of either and studied medicine instead, earning his way by teaching as he learned. In the laboratories, he made the acquaintance of people who more than once were to be his salvation in the ups and downs of his career. In 1848 he was one of the secretaries of the Society of Biology, newly founded by Claude Bernard.

Is it conceivable that a theory which harmonizes so many facts hitherto regarded as without either connection or explanation should not deserve at any rate consideration from those who profess to take an interest in biology? It is not as though the theory were unknown, or had been condemned by our leading men of science.

I availed myself of the opportunity to endeavour to "take stock" of that portion of the science of biology which is commonly called "palaeontology," as it then existed; and, discussing one after another the doctrines held by palaeontologists, I put before you the results of my attempts to sift the well-established from the hypothetical or the doubtful.

To lacerate my feelings, spurn my proffered aid, insult my youthful pristine zeal, and then to call me back in short, to throw a dog a bone! Nay, nay!" "Oh, Berta, be sweet. Tell me. You know that I think you have the most original ideas in college." After I had coaxed her quite a lot, she told me her new scheme. It was something like advanced character reading and biology combined.

Spencer's insuperable difficulty is "wholly imaginary." The extract concerning a somewhat similar "class of difficulties," which Mr. Spencer quotes from his Principles of Biology, is faulty in its reasoning, though legitimate in its conclusion concerning the increasing difficulty of evolution in proportion with the increasing number and complexity of faculties to be evolved.

When Galileo made that great discovery, the Church was right in not yielding at once to the evidence of an experiment which it did not understand. But when the fact was clearly established, no man sets up his interpretation of the Bible in opposition to it. Religious men admit all the facts connected with our solar system; all the facts of geology, and of comparative anatomy, and of biology.

Smashing socialism in the common sense that is, social democracy; but establishing a true socialism in harmony with the aristocratic principle. I'm sure you'd enjoy it. I fancy it's just your view." "Yes perhaps so " "Here's the central idea. No true sociology could be established before the facts of biology were known, as the one results from the other.

SAVVY. You must excuse me, Mr Lubin; but it's like hearing a man talk about the Garden of Eden. CONRAD. Why shouldnt he talk about the Garden of Eden? It was a first attempt at biology anyhow. I have heard of Darwin. SAVVY. But Darwin is all rot. LUBIN. What! Already!